The last week of March and the start of April saw mixed sentiment in the ETF space. Looking at the performance of the Spot Bitcoin [BTC] ETF, it saw inflows worth $69.4 million on the 30th of March, in which Ark Invest’s ARKB contributed $33 million.

Then, on the 31st of March, BTC ETFs saw inflows worth $117.5 million, in which BlackRock’s IBIT led the way, with $98.4 million.

However, things flipped on the 1st of April, wherein BTC ETFs recorded outflows worth $173.7 million, in which BlackRock’s IBIT saw maximum outflows worth $86.5 million.

The trend turned positive on the 2nd of April yet again, as the BTC ETF saw inflows worth $9 million, wherein Fidelity’s FBTC saw $7.3 million in inflows.

This coincided with Bitcoin seeing a drop to $65,000 on the 30th of March, but at press time, it was changing hands at $66,937.05.

How did the Spot Ethereum ETF perform?

Moving forward, Spot Ethereum ETFs saw inflows worth $5 million on the 30th of March, in which Fidelity’s FETH saw inflows worth $10.6 million. The next day, the ETH ETF saw inflows worth $31.2 million, wherein BlackRock’s ETHA was worth $24.7 million.

However, on the first day of Q2, inflows turned to outflows. As of the 1st of April, the ETH ETF recorded outflows worth $7.1 million, in which BlackRock’s ETHA witnessed outflows worth $32.3 million.

On the 2nd of April, the ETH ETF saw $71.2 million in outflows, in which BlackRock’s ETHA faced maximum outflows worth $46.7 million. 

This comes as ETH’s price was trading at $1,958 on the 30th of March, but at press time it stood at $2,043.42.

Solana and XRP ETF analysis

Now, when it comes to the Solana ETF, it too saw a rollercoaster ride. On the 30th of March, it recorded outflows worth $6.2 million, with Bitwise’s BSOL seeing the highest outflows worth $6.2 million.

Meanwhile, on the 31st of March and the 1st of April, the SOL ETF saw zero flows. Lastly, on the 2nd of April, SOL ETFs saw inflows worth $0.9 million, wherein Fidelity’s FBTC was the only one to see inflows worth $0.9 million. 

Zooming out, SOL price was trading at $80.01 on the 30th of March, whereas at press time it was $79.73. 

Lastly, XRP ETFs saw outflows worth $2.31 million on the 30th of March. Then on the 31st of March, it saw zero inflows.

Moving forward to the 1st of April, XRP ETFs saw outflows worth $1.32 million, and on the 2nd of April, they saw inflows of $64.6K. Meanwhile, XRP’s price was trading at $1.30, and at press time, it was at the same level, facing high volatility in the past week. 

---

Final Summary

• As 2026 transitions from Q1 to Q2, the ETF space is showing confused investor sentiment, juggling between inflows and outflows
• The price action of all the tokens is also mirroring the ETF flow analysis, showing that volatility is in full force. 

• Point2, an actual property platform, analyzed the return on funding in bitcoin vs. US properties between 2017 and 2021. 
• The corporate assumed an preliminary funding equal to a 20% down fee for the median dwelling in every of the 100 largest US cities.
• “Bitcoin worth appreciation blew dwelling worth will increase out of the water,” the evaluation discovered. 

An individual who put a down fee on a house in Manhattan 5 years in the past would lose cash in the event that they tried to promote that place immediately, whereas an funding in bitcoin would have allowed them to rake in almost $20 million. 

These are a part of the findings of a latest evaluation by Point2, a Canadian actual property platform that in contrast returns for an funding made in 2017 in bitcoin or in US residential actual property.

Costs for the cryptocurrency and US properties have every climbed since 2017. Nonetheless, “bitcoin worth appreciation blew dwelling worth will increase out of the water,” the corporate stated. 

Bitcoin has piled on roughly 6,100%, buying and selling at $61,900 at the beginning of November from round $998 when buying and selling in 2017 obtained underway, in accordance with CoinDesk information.  

In the meantime, the median gross sales worth of homes offered within the US had elevated by 29% in the identical interval, to $404,700 within the third quarter of 2021 from $313,100 within the first quarter of 2017, in accordance with figures from the US Census Bureau cited by the Federal Reserve Financial institution of St. Louis. 

“The concern of taking large dangers is what has stored many from investing,” and “as lots of the folks studying about dwelling costs and bitcoin can attest, remorse can actually sting,” the platform stated in a late November assertion about its evaluation. ​​

To match the 2 property, Point2 analysts assumed an preliminary funding equal to a 20% down fee for the median dwelling in every of the 100 largest cities within the US cities, primarily based on 2017 costs. 

Within the highest-priced residential actual property markets within the US, a 20% down fee in Manhattan in 2017 would’ve run at round $290,000, whereas San Francisco would’ve required $250,000. Translated to crypto, that down fee would’ve purchased 301 bitcoins and 260 bitcoins in these respective cities. 

In “the spirit of regretfully wanting again,” Point2 discovered that the massive winners would’ve been bitcoin buyers in Manhattan and San Francisco.

“Had they determined to put money into bitcoin an quantity equal to the median down fee in 2017, they’d have had greater than $18 million and $16 million of their crypto wallets immediately,” the corporate stated. 

To make certain, Manhattan was the most important outlier. The NYC borough logged the “most spectacular hole” between actual property and bitcoin earnings. Dwelling costs dropped by 31% over the five-year interval to a median worth of $1,000,000. “[Someone] who invested in a house in 2017 would lose cash in the event that they tried to promote it now,” it stated.

On the different finish of the record, Point2 weighed a 2017 dwelling down fee of $6,552 in Detroit in opposition to a crypto funding of seven bitcoins. Over the 5 years, the particular person in Detroit would’ve made about $45,000 in actual property features and about $680,000 in bitcoin. 

Actual property is the extra well-established funding selection, however bitcoin has “come a really good distance since its humble beginnings,” stated Point2. 

“In hindsight, not investing in bitcoin, and massively at that, looks as if an enormous mistake. Nonetheless, factoring within the asset’s excessive volatility brings issues again into perspective,” it stated. “That is as a result of investing in such a high-risk asset is just not instantly and clearly advantageous to nearly all of folks.”